The Trump administration does not fade away from judicial losses and establishes a view to the Supreme Court

CNN
–

Despite repeated White House attacks against federal judge James Boasberg, the Trump administration is still sure that it will prevail in current litigation on the use of the president’s executive branch.

Even before President Donald Trump resumed the office, his advisors expected his executive orders and other policy movements to face immediate legal challenges. These challenges were expected to be presented in districts that were friendly to the challengers and would result in initial losses for the administration.

That has been the case. More than 160 demands have been filed against several administration policies, said Attorney General Pam Bondi on Fox News. They are often in jurisdictions with mostly judges or all democratic judges such as Boston, Maryland, Seattle and Washington, DC, although that No guarantee success For the plaintiffs.

But Trump’s legal strategy has always been a long game designed to obtain these questions before the conservative supermayer in the Supreme Court, where his lawyers believe that Trump will prevail in his expansive use of the Executive Power. A recent series of judicial losses has not deteriorated the administration to continue pursuing this strategy.

While the result of these cases can have immediate effects for people in the center of each controversy, the Trump administration is playing a long game.

The Department of Justice will not change its approach despite a Rare statement issued by the president of the Supreme Court John Roberts condemning the president, without appointing him, for suggesting that a federal judge must be accused. Administration officials believe that the declaration is about publications on Trump’s social networks, not about the merits of their legal arguments, according to a source.

Trump responded to Roberts’s rebuke in an interview with Fox News on Tuesday night, saying that the comments of the president of Justice did not go to him and continued attacking Boasberg.

“Well, (Roberts) did not mention my name in the statement, and I saw it quickly,” Trump said. “He did not mention my name, but many people have requested the political trial (from Boasberg), the political trial of this judge.”

The main leaders of the Department of Justice have also been involved in an unusual force of force behind the arguments made in court on whether the administration challenged the order of a judge to stop the deportations of some migrants allegedly affiliated with a Venezuelan gang, adding their names to the judicial presentations normally signed by line prosecutors.

According to an administration official, the force show is intended to show support and solidarity with prosecutors who are working in this case. Boasberg has suggested that the government could have violated its order, which could result in sanctions against the lawyers of the Department of Justice or even be retained. The official said that having all the main leaders, including Bondi, signed with the arguments of the Department of Justice shows that they are not trying to leave a prosecutor out to be sanctioned.

Wolf asks Ret. Judge Breyer if the United States goes to a constitutional crisis

Wolf asks Ret. Judge Breyer if the United States goes to a constitutional crisis

08:16

Despite the confidence in the merits of their legal arguments, some officials and allies of Trump have continued to increase attacks against Boasberg and other members of the Judiciary.

“The District Court has no capacity to restrict the president’s authorities under the alien enemies law in which, as I think, to carry out the foreign affairs of the United States,” said the deputy director of Cabinet Stephen Miller to Kasie Hunt de CNN with respect to Boasberg’s decision.

The legal battle on deportations occurs in the midst of other judicial fights that the Department of Justice is defending to protect the president’s agenda. On Tuesday, a DC district judge, Ana Reyes, indefinitely blocked Trump’s ban on transgender service membersA controversial policy that Trump brought from his first term.

In Maryland, District Judge Theodore D. Chuang said that Elon Musk and his government efficiency department had exceeded his authority when trying to close Usaid. The judge’s ruling indefinitely blocked the dismantling of the agency.

The force show of the administration has continued publicly.

“These activist judges are trying to control our entire federal government,” Bondi said Wednesday at Fox News.

“He is having an unfounded reasoning for these mandates, and it is a clear effort of these judges on the agenda of this president,” said the White House Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, during her press conference on Wednesday.

After his interview with Fox News on Tuesday, Trump posted in Truth Social, referring to Boasberg as a “radical left lunatic judge.”

“If a president has no right to throw murderers and other criminals, outside our country because a radical left lunatic judge wants to assume the role of the president, then our country is in a big problem and is destined to fail!” Trump published in Truth Social.

Although the Department of Justice must more information about deportation flights to Boasberg before Thursday, you will have another opportunity to present your arguments during an audience next week before a Federal Appeals Court In Washington, DC. The three judges panel is composed of Trump nominees, George Hw Bush and Obama.

Hannah Rabinowitz de CNN contributed to this report.