Donald Trump exploits the Court’s review of workers’ restitution: “Judge to put himself in the position of president of the United States”

The president of the United States, Donald Trump, defended his mass layoffs of federal evidence, stating that the Supreme Court may need to intervene after two federal judges ruled the decision of his administration.

The layoffs, which affect approximately 30,000 workers in multiple agencies, have caused legal battles, with courts in California and Maryland issuing orders to stop the dismissals and restore affected employees.

“It is absolutely ridiculous. Triumph He said on board Air Force One on Sunday. “That is something very dangerous for our country.”

Trump also suggested that the courts should not have the authority to restore workers dismissed under their Federal Labor Reduction Plan.

“A judge wants us to pay them, even if they don’t know what they exist and if they exist,” Trump said. “And I don’t think that will happen.”

Judicial decisions against massive shots

Two federal judges, judge William Alsup in California and Judge James Bredar in Maryland, issued decisions against mass shots. Alsup ordered that thousands of test employees be restored.

Alsup statement: Declared that mass layoffs were illegal and that the Personnel Management Office (OPM) lacked the authority to execute them.

Bredar’s Ruling: He ordered that the shots cease for two weeks, stating that the Trump administration ignored the appropriate procedures.

“It’s sad, a sad day in which our government fired a good employee and said it was based on performance when they know well and good, that’s a lie.”

Trump’s mass layoffs and legal setback

As part of your plan to reduce federal workforce, Trump ordered dismissal In six main agencies:

Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of the Interior and Department of the Treasury.

The American Federation of Government Employees and 20 states led by Democrat have submitted demands, arguing that dismissals violated federal employment regulations. Many of the 30,000 dismissed employees dispute the statements of the administration of poor performance.

Trump’s administration appeals to files

He Trump administration According to reports, he has appealed decisions, arguing that states do not have the authority to challenge federal employment policies. Trump’s legal team insists that test workers, who lack complete civil service protections, can leave it based on performance problems, not to require the same legal processes as permanent employees.