The United States intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard reaffirms the commitment of President Donald Trump to counteract Islamist terrorism

New Delhi: The United States National Intelligence Director, Tulsi Gabbard, reiterated on Monday the commitment of the president of the United States, Donald Trump, to defeat the threat of Islamist terrorism that, according to her, continues to represent a direct threat to the US people. He pointed out that Prime Minister Narendra Modi also takes this threat seriously and added that the two leaders will work together to try to identify and defeat that threat.

In an interview with Ani, Gabbard said that terrorism has been affecting people in India, Bangladesh, Syria, Israel and different parts of the Middle East.

When asked how the Trump administration sees the repeated terrorist attacks against India from Pakistan, Gabbard replied: “President Trump, through his first administration in the presidency, and continues now, has been very clear about his commitment to defeat this threat of Islamist terrorism that unfortunately has struck us, and continues to present a direct threat to US people.”

“But, we see how people have impacted here in India, in Bangladesh, currently current in Syria, Israel and different countries in the Middle East. So this is a threat that I know that Prime Minister Modi also takes seriously and one in which the leaders of our two countries will work together to try to identify and defeat that threat,” he added.

By dismantling deep state assets and if they were involved in the change of regime in India, Tulsi Gabbard said that the intelligence professions of the United States were using a chat network based on intelligence to carry out a “highly non -professional and sexually explicit conversation” for a prolonged period of time. She declared that the action violates the expected basic professionalism of the employees of the United States government and the confidence that the people of the United States need to have in intelligence professionals.

“I can tell him that I know, the answer is no. What refers unfortunately was an incident that caught my attention in which during a prolonged period of time we had intelligence professionals who were using a chat network based on intelligence to carry out a very uncomfortable and sexually explicit conversation. This is not only that the basic professionals waiting for all our government employees, but really violate special people, The United States, what the people of intelligence need, people who have intelligence, people who have intelligence, people who need in the people of American people, what they need in the people of American people, what intelligence has intelligence, intelligence people, which has the creation of the people of the United States.

She expressed her commitment to ensure that the United States intelligence community focuses on her main mission to ensure the nation, seeking the truth and informing the truth so that the president of the United States, Donald Trump, can make the best informed decisions.

“Then, in my role as National Intelligence Director, this is an area that is my unique priority when it comes to ensuring that our intelligence community focuses on its main mission to ensure our country, looking for the truth and informing that the truth for our president to make the best informed decisions. Therefore, anything else that distracts that, we want to go out in the form, whether it is in the chat rooms or the most serious threats. Of those we see, whether they are the most serious threats of which it looks more serious, whether they are the most serious threats of what is seen.

At the beginning of February, President Donald Trump had questioned the assignment of the US Government of USD 21 million for the participation of voters in India, describing him as an “overload scheme.” He also talked about the financing of USD 21 million to strengthen the political landscape in Bangladesh and USD 19 million for Biodiversity in Nepal.

Discharge of responsibility: This is a syndicated diet. The article is not edited by the FPJ editorial team.