Cheryl Tweedy Stalker who went to the girls Aloud Star’s Bucks at home imprisoned

Daniel Bannister, 50, admitted to having gone to the 41 -year -old Buckinghamshire house and playing the bell at the door on December 10 last year, while forbidding him for a restriction order.

Bannister, whom the court heard “cannot stay away from the singer, visited his house twice last year before being slapped with the order.

He spoke through an intercom system at the door in January 2024, claiming that he had “come to look for Cheryl,” he told the court.

In July of the same year, he called the house again and said: “I have the thirst, I just want a glass of wine, please.”

READ MORE: Cheryl Tweedy’s Bucks Stalker sentence postponed

Tweedy “immediately panicked” when he saw Bannister out of his house for the third time, and his son Bear, seven years old, was concerned according to the court.

Fall for 16 weeks in the Wycombe Magistrates court on Friday, District Judge Arvind Sharma said Bannister knew that the singer was “very distressed and annoying” for what he was doing.

Bannister, who was described by his lawyer as a “serious musician,” has already turned three months in prison, according to the court, and could be released in a matter of weeks.

He killed Rajendra Patel, 48, in an attack on a southern London shelter in 2012 and declared himself guilty of involuntary homicide, The Sun reported.

On Friday, he was sentenced for two positions of harassment related to the violation of a restriction order, and a position to try to violate a restriction order.

Prosecutor Datta Ryan told the Court that in January last year, Bannister appeared in Cheryl’s house around 7.30 pm

“He said ‘It’s Daniel, I’ve come to look for Cheryl,” the prosecutor told the Court.

“He was terrified and contacted his security guard.

“He felt raped, terrified and insecure in his own home.”

Daniel Bannister (Image: Thames Valley Police)

In July of the same year, the singer was at home with her son when she saw Bannister outside.

“She called her brother,” Ryan said.

“The defendant was standing out of his property and remained there.”

Speaking about the intercom, he said: “I am very thirsty, I just want a glass of wine, please,” the court heard.

After the incidents of January and July, Bannister received a restriction order, as well as a four -month prison sentence in September, but again appeared on the property in December.

“The defendant has ignored the victim and the court,” Ryan said.

“You can’t stay away.”

Speaking about the December visit in a statement to the police, the singer said: “He knew he was Daniel because I had previous incidents in which Daniel has come to my property.

“I immediately panicked when I saw Daniel.

“I feared for my safety and safety of my son.

“My son returned from the cinema and did not want him to see Daniel.

“I worried that I was looking for a road on the property.

“I want to protect my son from any damage.”

Colin Mackrell, defending, described Bannister as a “serious musician” who shares self -acting videos.

“It is clear that Mr. Bannister has formed an affectionate vision of her,” he said.

Speaking about the third visit home, Mr. Mackrell said: “He wanted to solve things to reassure her.”

Bannister asked the judge if he could read a statement to the court, but his lawyer did not advise him.

By imprisoning him, Judge Sharma said: “You knew for the last case that I was very distressed and annoying and that you still decided to do that again.”

The judge also handed Bannister a new restriction order, forbidding him to contact the singer.

The former singer’s partner, Liam Payne, died last year in Buenos Aires, Argentina, after falling from his balcony of the third floor hotel.

She described the death of the former One Direction star as “indescribablely painful,” since she expressed fears about protecting her son.

Kathleen O’Callaghan, from the Crown Prosecutor’s Office, said: “The unwanted attention of criminals such as Daniel Bannister can leave victims that they feel alarmed and fearful.

“Bannister clearly ignored a previous restriction order, and the crown prosecution service argued that these deliberate infractions became more serious due to the fact that they were committed so shortly after the order was made. As a result, Bannister now faces a longer prison period with an indefinite restriction order that was imposed. ”