What protection order was Judge Grant to Blake Lively against Justin Baldoni in the middle of the current legal dispute? Explained

Everyone’s eyes are glued to their screens these days for updates on the drama Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. In a new development, the Shallows actress has been awarded a modified protection order in the event that she ends with the co -star of us, according to People magazine.

According to the report, the scope of the restrictions requested by it has been limited by the Court. The decision, taken by Judge Lewis J. Liman, arrived on Thursday, March 13. According to reports, it was ruled that some confidential material would be protected. According to the exit, the designation of “only lawyers” can only be applied if their dissemination is “very likely to cause important commercial, commercial, financial or privacy injuries.”

This ruling follows the era of Adaline’s actress on March 6 so that the strictest safeguards do not allow private information to filter the media or circulate inside Hollywood, according to the publication.

According to the reports, the judge pointed out in his written ruling the risks involved in the spread of delicate details through the gossip of the industry.

It will be interesting to see the reactions of Internet users to this decision, since many have been closely following the smallest details of this drama and sharing their online opinions.

After the decision, Lively The spokesman declared: “Today, the court rejected the objections of the parts of the roads and entered the necessary protections to guarantee the free flow of discovery material without any risk of intimidation or witness damage to the safety of any individual.”

The spokesman also added that with this order in his place, the actress will proceed with the discovery process to gather more evidence that supports her accusations in the Court.

In BaldoniThe side of his lawyer, Bryan Freedman, also issued a statement, saying that they completely support the decision of the court to grant “a limited scope of protections to categories such as private mental health records and personal security measures” that were never of interest to them. This contrasts with what he described as “the excessive demand for Mrs. documents.

Freedman emphasized that his approach remains to obtain the necessary communications that “will directly contradict the unfounded accusations of Mrs. Lively.”