There are scores to settle and opportunities to snatch on Saturday, March 1 when some of the largest stars of the WWE fight in the Elimination Chamber: Toronto In the Rogers Center in Toronto.
The Premium Live event is scheduled to start at 7 pm est and will only be available to transmit Peacock. Fans can see a repetition of the event after it is broadcast and can also see the pre-show, starting two hours before the PLE, and the live press conference immediately after it.
There are four scheduled matches for the elimination chamber: Toronto and none of them are championship matches, but the two elimination camera matches will determine contestants No. 1 for the World Women’s Championship and the indisputable WWE championship for Wrestlemania 41.
This event will also mark the last time John Cena participates in the elimination chamber. Dinner is looking to close his career at the top and challenge Cody Rhodes for the WWE championship in his last Wrestlemania in April. However, former rivals CM Punk and Seth Rollins will fight for that same opportunity, along with Drew McIntyre, Damian Priest and Logan Paul.
In the women’s elimination chamber, Liv Morgan, Alexa Bliss, Bianca Belair, Bayley and Naomi enter as former champions of the women’s division, while Roxanne Pérez de Nxt seeks to validate her nickname and demonstrate that she is WWE prodigy.
In addition, some of the best Canadian superstars of the WWE of all time will seek to organize a program that includes friends and rivals of a long time Kevin Owens and Sami Zayn, who will fight in an unauthorized party, where there are no rules and nothing is worth. And the member of the WWE Hall of Fame, Trish Stratus, with the WWE Women’s Champion, Tiffany Stratton, in a label team against former champion NIA Jax and Candice Larae.
Finally, WWE’s final boss, The Rock, will appear to discuss an offer that made the WWE undisputed champion, Cody Rhodes.
Parties list:
- WWE’s undisputed champion, Cody Rhodes, goes to the rock
- Tiffany Stratton and Trish Stratus vs. Nia Jax and Candice Larae
- Unauthorized party: Kevin Owens vs. Sami Zayn
- Women’s elimination camera match (Determine the #1 contender for the Women’s World Championship in Wrestlemania 41): Bianca Belair vs. Liv Morgan vs. Bayley vs. Naomi vs. Roxanne Pérez vs. Alexa Bliss
- Male elimination chamber match (determines the #1 contender for the WWE Championship indisputable in Wrestlemania 41): Seth Rollins vs. John Cena vs. Drew McIntyre vs. Logan Paul vs. Damian Priest vs. Cm punk
When: Saturday, March 1 at 7 pm est
Where: Rogers Center in Toronto
Stream: Peacock
What is the peacock?
Peacock It is the home of the Premier League, Sunday Night Football, exclusive university football games, live events of WWE Premium and the Olympic Games, as well as the programming in the NBCuniversal networks.
Related content:
By Dave Collins Associated Press
A former professional businessman Vince McMahon was wrong to retain some documents from a federal grand jury when investigating how the former WWE chief handled multimillion -dollar settlement agreements with two employees who accused him of sexual abuse, a federal court of appeals ruled on Monday.
Three judges in the Second Court of Appeals of the United States in New York confirmed a ruling from the lower court that said the documents were not protected by the lawyer-client privilege due to an exception for the “crime or fraud.”
The Court of Appeals said that the judge of the lower court found that prosecutors had reasonable reasons to believe that McMahon and his lawyer “illegally” showed “the internal controls of the WWE and created false records when they hid the claims of the employees and the liquidation agreements of the company and that they made false statements and deceived to the auditors of the company, although McMahon paid With the funds that did not leave the funds that were not coming from the company’s statements.
The appeal panel said that, although McMahon’s lawyer presented many materials in response to a jury citation, they also presented a record of 208 documents that were being held under statements of privilege of lawyer-client.
Although the identities of the parties were not revealed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, a person familiar with the matter confirmed that the “former executive director of a” company that quotes in the stock market “was McMahon. The person insisted on the anonymity to discuss the details that have not been made public.
The state of the investigation of the Grand Jury was not clear immediately. The United States Prosecutor’s Office in Manhattan has declined to comment when asked about the investigation, which has not revealed publicly.
The representatives of McMahon, who has denied irregularities, said they had no immediate comments about the court ruling. McMahon has previously suggested that he was no longer under investigation.
In January, McMahon said in a statement that “almost three years of investigation by different government agencies” in their actions had ended. The statement occurred when the Federal Stock Exchange and Securities Commission announced that it had resolved the charges against McMahon for not revealing the liquidation agreements with the two employees now trainers to the WWE officials.
“In the end, there was never anything else that the minor accounting errors regarding some personal payments that I did several years ago while it was CEO of WWE,” the statement said. “I am delighted to be able to leave all this behind.”
However, the Court of Appeals said in Monday’s ruling that the case “refers to the procedures at a large jury. At present, no accusations have been issued.”
The opinion revealed some new details of the investigation of the Great Jury.
The representatives of one of the former employees who obtained a McMahon conciliation agreement, Janel Grant, declined to comment on Monday.
McMahon resigned from the WWE parent company in January 2024 after Grant filed a federal lawsuit that accused him of another former executive of serious sexual behavior. At that time, McMahon resigned his position as executive president of the Board of Directors of the WWE Matrix Company, Tko Group Holdings. He continued to deny irregularities after the presentation of the demand.
McMahon resigned as CEO of the WWE in 2022 in the midst of an investigation of the company on accusations that coincide with those of the demand.
Grant has said she was pressed to leave her job with the WWE and sign a non -dissemination agreement of $ 3 million. The demand, which alleges sexual aggression and traffic, also seeks that the agreement be declared invalid, saying that McMahon violated the agreement by giving him $ 1 million and not paying the rest.
The $ 3 million agreement is mentioned in the decision of the Court of Appeals on Monday, along with another $ 7.5 million agreement that McMahon made with another former employee.
Associated Press normally does not appoint people who make accusations of sexual assault unless they present themselves publicly, what did.
The prosecutors attended to the summons about McMahon’s lawyer, who has no name in the judicial documents, and the signature of the lawyer in September 2023, looking for all the communications between McMahon, his lawyer and the law firm with respect to the two previous employees, according to the Court of Appeals. The lawyer helped McMahon negotiate the agreements, the court said.
When the lawyer retained some of the documents that claim the lawyer-client privilege, prosecutors asked the lower court to force the production of the records, which led to the appeal decided on Monday.
The appeal judges wrote: “Because the liquidation agreements resolved by the victims’ claims were” structured and negotiated … to keep them hidden from (the company), “the District Court determined that” all communications on claims and liquidation agreements were made at the bottom of the criminal scheme to maintain (the company) and its inappropriate auditors of the accusations. “
___
Associated Press Eric Tucker writer in Washington, DC, contributed to this report.
Associated Press contributed to this article.
